Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:48:20 +0100
From:  Dogsbody <dan (at mark) dogsbody.org>
Subject:  [coba-e:13670] Re: apache suexec
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <48923324.8090704 (at mark) dogsbody.org>
In-Reply-To:  <00a001c8f308$13d5b640$3b8122c0$@com>
References:  <0b9201c8f2e4$d3d005f0$967da8c0 (at mark) thomasferrari> <722224.90970.qm (at mark) web65612.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <00a001c8f308$13d5b640$3b8122c0$ (at mark) com>
X-Mail-Count: 13670


> The issue as I see it (and I have seen this too) is when files are created
> via apache (as in php creating a file) they are created with the user and
> group of apache. In the RaQ4 files were created with the user of httpd and
> the group of the site. 

This is exactly the issue!!

Now I could be wrong here but I would swear that this used to work 
correctly (like the Raq4) in *very* early releases of BQ!  I *think* 
this broke with an httpd update from CentOS or it could of been when we 
started using CentOS (that long ago).

It has to be a config setting somewhere although I'm wondering about 
Thomas's find that suexec seems to be compiled with a wrong document 
root!?  Can suexec's document root be set via a variable without 
recompiling?

Sorry for questions and not answers, I am a few days away from a big 
charity marathon I organise and don't have any time.

Regards, Dan