Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:31:35 -0600
From:  "Robert Howard" <rahoward2004 (at mark) gmail.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:08036] Re: OT: Spamcop BL - good or dangerous?
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <afd5bba50611290831j6073ec84wf482401bcd86686f (at mark) mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <038e01c713cc$9358e080$3701a8c0@lapxp>
References:  <20061129122449.M35981 (at mark) vaporised.com>	 <038e01c713cc$9358e080$3701a8c0 (at mark) lapxp>
X-Mail-Count: 08036

Out of curiosity, has anyone tried using a whitelist/blacklist filter like
TMDA?  I have been told that the "BoxTrapper" whitelist program built into
cPanel has a lot of overhead and causes server problems.  Is that also true
with something like TMDA on BQ?  I definitely like having a whitelist, so
I'm open to any options that work well with BlueQuartz.

On 11/29/06, Arthur Sherman <arturs (at mark) netvision.net.il> wrote:
>
> Hi Vapor,
>
> The list is spamassassin.apache.org.
> I've sent the maintainer the message reg. his mailer blocked at Spamcop.
> Advise to get rid of Spamcop was also his...
>
> After consideration, I'll stay with the BL.
> Just will have change my subscribtion address to the ISP's one.
>
> Thanks for your help, especially for the cf part.
>
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Arthur Sherman
>
> +972-52-4878851
> CPTeam
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vapor [mailto:bluequartz (at mark) vaporised.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 2:33 PM
> > To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> > Subject: [coba-e:08033] Re: OT: Spamcop BL - good or dangerous?
> >
> > Arthur,
> >
> > On a secondary note, iirc several months back a post was made
> > about editing the
> > sendmail.cf/mc to check the servers allowable relays database
> > prior to dnsbls. I've no
> > idea whether this has been integrated into later versions of
> > BQ or Brian's ISO's. On my
> > installs I just make sure I add my dnsbl lines into the
> > sendmail.mc just above the
> > "MAILER(smtp)dnl" line, so they are performed last, after
> > other checks, seems to work.
> >
> > Certainly worth adding your problem email servers IP to
> > "Network Services > Email >
> > Advanced Tab > Relay Email From Hosts/Domains/IP Addresses
> > (optional) Box" - if mail
> > then passes through you can still use Spamcop!
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > Brett
> >
>
>
>

	

8036_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)